<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can You Make Money With Proxy Sites?</title>
	<link>http://cgmtechnologies.com/blog/proxy-sites/can-you-make-money-with-proxy-sites/</link>
	<description>Join me as I pursue a full time income on the internet.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Proxy</title>
		<link>http://cgmtechnologies.com/blog/proxy-sites/can-you-make-money-with-proxy-sites/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Proxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cgmtechnologies.com/blog/proxy-sites/can-you-make-money-with-proxy-sites/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Proxy sites as any other sites need to have time to grow up, got good position on SE and everything else will be fine.
There is not need to hurry up and if i should chouse between quantity (number of sites) and quality i would chose for last one.
It is better to have one proxy site with good SERP than 100 proxy sites with bad SERP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proxy sites as any other sites need to have time to grow up, got good position on SE and everything else will be fine.<br />
There is not need to hurry up and if i should chouse between quantity (number of sites) and quality i would chose for last one.<br />
It is better to have one proxy site with good SERP than 100 proxy sites with bad SERP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How To Get Money</title>
		<link>http://cgmtechnologies.com/blog/proxy-sites/can-you-make-money-with-proxy-sites/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>How To Get Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 10:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cgmtechnologies.com/blog/proxy-sites/can-you-make-money-with-proxy-sites/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>I was researching the same thing when I saw this.. I can not agree more - but I am still going to look for a better source</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was researching the same thing when I saw this.. I can not agree more - but I am still going to look for a better source</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
